Example Achievement Log for a Aerospace Engineer

Engineering

Example Achievement Log for a Aerospace Engineer

This Aerospace Engineer spent the year moving between structural analysis on a wing redesign, mentoring a junior hire, and firefighting a manufacturing deviation that almost delayed a customer delivery. Her log shows the mix of planned work, unexpected problems, and feedback that shaped her performance.

A year in the life of a Aerospace Engineer's log

  • Jan - task: Took point on CY-2024 wing box stress analysis for the 737 winglet retrofit. Running NASTRAN models to validate that increased aileron loads don't exceed 2024-T4 aluminum fatigue limits at root. First time owning the full analysis chain end-to-end.
  • Mar - feedback: Sarah from manufacturing said in our design review: you caught that rivet spacing was going to cause local buckling we'd have missed. Saved us a second build cycle. Made the catch because I plotted the strain output to screen instead of just reading the summary.
  • Mar - achievement: Finished winglet stress model validation against test rig data. Peak bending stress prediction was 2.1% high; within acceptable scatter. Model released for manufacturing drawings and approved by structures lead Danny Ortiz.
  • Apr - task: Started mentoring Alex, new grad hire from ASU. Running through CATIA basics, our material properties database, and baseline FEA workflow. Also covering the unwritten stuff: which FAA forms we actually need versus which are cargo cult.
  • Jun - task: Manufacturing flagged rivet hole diameter creep in batch 304. Tooling wearing and holes undersized by 0.008 to 0.012 inches. Pulled all parts, had to rework fit-check tolerance stack and rerun bearing stress calcs for the deviation.
  • Jun - achievement: Completed bearing stress analysis of the undersized holes under static and fatigue. Showed with 0.005 inch clearance loss, stress concentration factor rose from 2.8 to 3.4 but remained within material allowables. Customer delivery stayed on schedule.
  • Aug - feedback: Lead structures engineer Marcus told me after the deviation meeting: your quick rework on the bearing analysis bought us the margin to ship on time. That's the engineering that matters. Made me feel like I'd actually moved past checklist work.
  • Sep - task: Alex presented her first analysis to the team: panel flutter speed for the new control surface. Approach was sound but she missed corrosion knockdown factors in the stiffness. Worked through Mil-Handbook-5 with her on what the 0.85 knockdown actually means.
  • Sep - achievement: Closed out winglet retrofit program after final assembly inspection and weight statement signed off. Total structural weight came in 1.2 pounds under prediction. Delivered on-time and within FAA Part 23 Subpart C all certification requirements.
  • Nov - task: Assigned to preliminary design on the 737 MAX wing fold kit for a development contract. New type of failure mode: gust load reversals during folded flight. Will need transient aeroelastic analysis, which I've never done before.
  • Dec - achievement: Completed flutter analysis methodology review for wing fold design. Selected ZAERO for aeroelastic coupling and set up the model architecture. Danny approved method before we build the full model. Sets up Q1 execution.

What makes a strong entry

What most people write: Completed bearing stress analysis following manufacturing issue.

What went in the log: Completed bearing stress analysis of the undersized holes under static and fatigue. Showed with 0.005 inch clearance loss, stress concentration factor rose from 2.8 to 3.4 but remained within material allowables. Customer delivery stayed on schedule.

Adds the actual numbers (stress factors, clearance loss) and the consequence (delivery risk eliminated), which a reviewer needs to weigh the real impact of the firefighting work.

What most people write: Took lead on wing box stress analysis for winglet retrofit.

What went in the log: Took point on CY-2024 wing box stress analysis for the 737 winglet retrofit. Running NASTRAN models to validate that increased aileron loads don't exceed 2024-T4 aluminum fatigue limits at root. First time owning the full analysis chain end-to-end.

Specifies the tool (NASTRAN), material (2024-T4), the actual failure mode being checked (fatigue at root), and the scope change (end-to-end ownership), making it concrete enough to recall six months later and to distinguish from previous similar work.

How this becomes your review in November

Over the past year, I took full ownership of the structural analysis for the 737 winglet retrofit, moving from a guided contributor to leading the NASTRAN modeling and validation work end-to-end. When manufacturing flagged rivet hole diameter creep mid-year, I reworked the bearing stress analysis under time pressure and showed the deviation remained within allowables, which kept the customer delivery on schedule. In parallel, I mentored a new graduate hire through FEA basics and the unwritten engineering practices that matter, particularly around applying material knockdown factors correctly. The winglet program closed on time and within all FAA certification requirements, with structural weight coming in 1.2 pounds under prediction.

Starting your own log

Don't try to reconstruct a year you have already had. Start from today, one line whenever something happens, and let it build. The Perform Review Achievement Log does this for you and can capture wins straight from Slack, and how to start an achievement log covers the wider playbook.

Example Logs for Related Roles

Ready to start your own? Start your Achievement Log free, see how the Perform Review Achievement Log works, or browse performance review phrases for Aerospace Engineer.